Chief Dupnik is lying like a rug.
His story has gotten larger and larger by the day.
The Sherriff admits they had no evidence on the man and yet he perceives that the man susected he was being arrested for murder? If the man suspected that why didn’t he open fire immediately.If they come to arrest a man for murder, does that make it right to shoot him down?
I don’t know the mans record or what the Sherriff thought he had on him, I don’t know a lot about this, but I do suspect the Sherriff’s office is guilty of a huge screw-up and are trying to lie their way out of it.
Then why'd he have the safety on?
Police are in "throwing mud" mode. Screw the facts, if they make him out to be an evil enough guy, then the public will beleive that no matter what happened, the victim "needed killin'"