But the grim reality of widespread unemployment is drawing little response from Washington......
Washington will get more than a "little response" in the next election....
To: AngelesCrestHighway
To: AngelesCrestHighway
Obama’s chickens are coming home to roost.
To: AngelesCrestHighway
I doubt the socialist experiment is dead. There are too many people, Chamber of Commerce type Republicans included, who believe that government can run the economy. Every little town has its own economic development plans and convincing them that central planning always fails is impossible.
To: AngelesCrestHighway
Coming from the NYT, this has to be considered a shot across the bow by the administration. But I doubt anyone in that administration (or in the Democratic side of Congress) has any clue whatsoever of what to do.
5 posted on
06/02/2011 2:17:55 PM PDT by
bcsco
(..)
To: AngelesCrestHighway
Expect the numbers to be cooked (even more than they already are) and then highly touted by the state run media. We'll be enjoying 6.8% unemployment and a 6% growth in GDP by 2012 according to the government and media experts and it will be main news story of how can the Republicans expect to beat Obama with this economic miracle. Meantime, the reality will be otherwise.
To: AngelesCrestHighway
socialists will further delude themselves by believing that Hussein was not socialist enough
8 posted on
06/02/2011 2:25:18 PM PDT by
mjp
((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
To: AngelesCrestHighway
9 posted on
06/02/2011 2:26:40 PM PDT by
FrankR
(A people that values its privileges above its principles will soon lose both.)
To: AngelesCrestHighway
They will lie, cheat and steal to get those numbers down by 2012.
10 posted on
06/02/2011 2:27:59 PM PDT by
Sybeck1
(Welcome to the Willard Romney, "It's My Turn" tour..................)
To: AngelesCrestHighway
The unemployment rate is a lie. Politicians and the complicit MSM have made that number useless. People do not get counted as unemployed after they are out of work for more than six months... Not when they have actually found a job.
One needs to actually look at the labor force participation rate to determine the true unemployment rate, which is much higher.
12 posted on
06/02/2011 2:39:29 PM PDT by
Bon mots
To: AngelesCrestHighway
FLEECE TRADE JOB SUCKING SOUND
CAN YOU HEAR IT NOW?
14 posted on
06/02/2011 2:42:11 PM PDT by
ex-snook
("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory")
To: AngelesCrestHighway
7.2%? How in the world did they cook up that number when we’ve been bleeding jobs for 2 years? There hasn;t been a single month where the jobs created would even cover those entering the workforce every month let alone those who have lost their jobs.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson