ah hate to differ on this silly issue but there are doctors on both sides of this issue. (surgery infections etc.)
it boils down to a personal decision based on faith.
Personal decision based on faith. You hit the nail on the head. Why then is S.F. NOT allowing it to be a personal issue based on faith? That’s a key issue here, that this circumcision issue is even on the ballot in the first place.
Yes, there are doctors on both sides, and personal opinions and values on both sides. Yet enough people in SF believe it is NOT a personal or family choice. Otherwise it wouldn’t be voted on in the first place.