Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
The irony is that a circumcised penis is more resistant to the hiv virus: Circumcised men are less likely to become hiv infected

One would think that homosexual friendly San Francisco would welcome such a procedure. But when has science intruded on pc garbage thought?

12 posted on 06/02/2011 7:47:45 AM PDT by Stepan12 (Palin & Bolton in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Stepan12

Anyone else know what “Docking” is?


16 posted on 06/02/2011 7:58:28 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Stepan12

Contacting HIV is only a concern if you are a homosexual/bisexual male, or an IV drug user... 98% of all cases fall into these two classes. Sure there are stories of tainted blood transfusions and the like, but the VAST majority is still within the two groups mentioned.

“On the other hand, a WHO report recommended that male circumcision be recognized as “an efficacious intervention for HIV prevention.”

Notice that the WHO doesn’t recommend outlawing homosexual acts or illegal drug use to prevent HIV/AIDS. (too political).


25 posted on 06/02/2011 8:20:41 AM PDT by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson