To: ansel12
When the liberal media refers to border control advocates as “anti-immigration” conservatives cringe. We are talking about ILLEGAL immigration. Not legal immigration.
I hope they never read these last few comments from you. It’s the kind of ammo they love to make their argument.
67 posted on
06/02/2011 9:56:24 PM PDT by
Eric Blair 2084
(Beware of the Socialist Government-Academia Grant Junkie-Rich "non-profit"-Liberal Media Complex)
To: Eric Blair 2084
We can't preserve America, or ever return to it, if we continue mass immigration of people that are totally different from us in every way. Gain a restaraunt, lose a nation, besides crowded nations suck.
68 posted on
06/02/2011 10:08:35 PM PDT by
ansel12
( JIM DEMINT "I believe [Palins] done more for the Republican Party than anyone since Ronald Reagan")
To: Eric Blair 2084
Assuming that a thing is desirable simply because it's legal is mindless and inconsistent with a multitude of conservative positions. Conservatives don't conclude that abortion is good, nor TARP commendable, nor affirmative action desirable simply because the state sanctions these things.
The legal immigration status quo favors illiterate, uneducated foreigners who are related to lawful residents over skilled foreigners who have no such relatives, it imports 1 million persons per year when one out of ten Americans can't find work, and it overburdens law enforcement with a superabundance of potential criminals and terrorists.
It does all these things, in addition to inflicting other outrages, while being perfectly legal. Hence, legality is no guarantee of harmlessness, let alone benefit.
72 posted on
06/03/2011 8:56:41 AM PDT by
mcosta79
(As with all things state-sanctioned, immigration's legality doesn't ensure its virtue.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson