Twitter is not public property.
I’m still trying to get you to see that this was something done in a private home, on private time.
We cannot give up to this idea that everything anyone does is the business of everyone else. That’s a flawed concept. It should be obvious that it is.
One good thing about earlier generations is, they knew how to stay out of another person’s business. Or at least refrain from making public statements about it, regardless of what was said in the privacy of family homes.
There are people on here that are in their 50s ,60s and 70s that should remember such a time and know better.
If the picture had been sent in email, and was leaked by the college girl, we’d still be having the same discussion. Making it about Twitter isn’t the issue. Another distraction, an excuse to turn everything into a reality show mess.
It’s not about Twitter. Twitter was the channel it happened to make it into. The point is his apparent inability to discern what needs to be kept confidential, and insure that it does. He let his dick get ahead of his brain, and that’s not something I want to see in a person who’s being entrusted with national security information.
EvasiveManuever...
Things posted on the internet are not private because the poster is inside their home. Putting something on the internet is publishing it for the world to see. Most people realize that email is not reliably private either.
As far as morality goes, you appear to be subscribing to the recent hippie age ideas that either adultery, sodomy and fornication are acceptable and moral acts, or, that they are immoral acts but they should not be prosecuted. The event which legalized morality crimes was initiated not by any leglislature, but by the American Law Institute, when they published the Model Penal Code in 1962, which, under the guise of “standardization”, encouraged State legislatures to sappily follow along and omit moral crimes. Prior to that, immoral acts were illegal in all States, and had been so in the civilized world. Rampant immorality was acceptable at various times and places, as a rule, during the decline of a nation or empire or a time a upheaval.
I don’t know of anyone who would make the argument that these immoral acts were not committed in some mythical time in the past, like the 1950’s; of course, they have always been committed. They were simply not viewed as acceptable by society and the law.
If people think that they can have sustainable prosperity, just working on all the symptomatic problems of national defense, government spending on handout programs, corruption, failed education system, etc., without working on the cause, a lapse of morality, they are sadly mistaken.
One only has to look at the life story of individuals to see a miniature version of national decline played out. One moral lapse leads to others, and a life spirals downward. How does the person who’s life has spun out of control regain prosperity ? By landing a great job ? Starting a new business ? No. They have to work on their heart and mind first, or the next endeavor will just be a continuation of the same mess.
This is exactly what conservatives are now saying publicly more often, that social conservatism is the only way out of our current problems, that fiscal soundness and national security, if pursued by an immoral leadership, will be fleeting if they are ever attained at all. Are morality laws coming back any time soon ? Probably not, since immoral acts have now been contorted in the minds of many to be part of our founding principles.
And yes, immorality does have cost to society. I know because it cost me dearly, and I got off easier than many. Just let the immorality continue ? Laissez-faire ? Parents can not raise their children successfully that way, and America will soon wither, having citizens that only seek personal and immediate gratification.