Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

I have seen no proof that “natural born citizen” was not used by the founders as an alternate way of saying “native born citizen.”

We have zero documentation of how the wording wound up as it did. This portion of the Constitution seems to have been voted in with almost no discussion.


35 posted on 06/01/2011 12:32:27 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan
Two ways of saying the same thing as far as I can tell. All this “native born” - “naturalized by statute” crap is just a way for people to make up a class of citizenship that did not exist previously.

One is either born, and via that natural act, has citizenship under natural law - and is thus a “natural born citizen” - or one must go through a legal process to confer what nature did not - they mus be “natural-IZED” into citizenship.

There are only two ways of becoming a U.S. citizen - and it makes sense to me that there are correspondingly two types of citizens of these United States - those who are natural born citizens - and those who had to be natural-IZED.

37 posted on 06/01/2011 12:36:42 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson