Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: andy58-in-nh

She can do that all that stuff she wants as a non-candidate but I guarantee you, with a 60% disapproval rating, there are a lot of people who are turned off by her style MORE than her policies.

I say that because other conservatives with similar policy positions don’t have anywhere near the negatives that Palin does. Take Michele Bachmann for instance.

For me, it’s the fingernails-on-the-blackboard voice that does it. Get her a little agitated and she turns it on reflexibly. Get her more than a little agitated and she turns into a hysterical harpy.

She reminds me way too much of my ex-wife screeching at me to do this or that chore when a rational tone of voice would have gotten much better results.

It’s not helpful for female politicians to make male voters think of their ex-wives.


47 posted on 06/01/2011 11:25:02 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Scanian
So now we understand why you hate Sarah. You hate women because of the hurt you feel from the betrayal of your ex-wife. Sorry, that disqualifies you for having an unbiased opinion.

I suspect that the largest reason for objections against Sarah is due to misogyny. I see that in Krauthammer's objections to her. He would never have the same objections toward a male candidate.

49 posted on 06/01/2011 3:06:50 PM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Scanian

“She can do that all that stuff she wants as a non-candidate but I guarantee you, with a 60% disapproval rating, there are a lot of people who are turned off by her style MORE than her policies.”

Firstly, those polls are not to be trusted.

Secondly, her high disapproval numbers are due more to something mentioned in the article—”Stories abound, all negative, about this American citizen whose message resonates with ordinary citizens yet doesn’t conform to the current political and media template.”—than to anything she has said or done.

The media have been red in fang and claw since 2008 in their attempts to dirty her reputation, and some people have been taken in.

Allow me please to quote Oswald Spengler from “Decline of the West, Volume II,” authorized translation, 1928:

“What is truth? For the multitude, that which it continually reads and hears. A forlorn little drop may settle somewhere and collect grounds on which to determine “The Truth”—but what it obtains is just its truth. The other, the public truth of the moment, which alone matters for effects and successes in the fact-world, is today a product of the press. What the press wills, is true. Its commanders evoke, transform, interchange truths. Three weeks of press work, and the truth is acknowledged by everybody....A more appalling caricature of freedom of thought cannot be imagined. Formerly a man did not dare to think freely. Now, he dares, but cannot; his will to think is only a willingness to think to order, and this is what he feels is HIS liberty.”

I will say this: the voice she uses to address screaming crowds is not her normal voice. Her normal voice is actually quite nice. Whoever is advising her to use that voice should be fired immediately.


53 posted on 06/01/2011 6:19:54 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson