[algernonpj]

...Maybe at least reading the article would be nice.

It's a typical NTY Marxist/anti-business hit piece -- only a Marxist would say it's bad when businesses make more profit with fewer employees. Increased productivity is a good thing. Furthermore the article came out last January --that ain't news it's history, and the update is that the latest quarterly changes show corp profits down 2%, corp. taxes up 7%, and employee comp. holding steady.

Cool more deflecting, i.e. castigating me for comments I did not make!;)

[arrogantsob]

Those were not my comments.

[expat_panama]

a typical NTY Marxist/anti-business hit piece -- only a Marxist would say it's bad when businesses make more profit

castigating me for comments I did not make!;)

It's hard to tell which comments you're being castigated for, but if it's that 'profits are bad' thing then please understand that's what the NYT was saying, not you.  This NYT article is a mindless worthless outdated Marxist party rant --and that makes hedgetrimmer's post #45 even more weird because she seems to be agreeing with the 'profits-without-jobs' lie and blaming it on trade.

[hedgetrimmer]

expat_panama is one of those Obama alinsky school bloggers. He takes his political philosphy, Marxist global communism, and uses the Alinsky technique of projection against those who are attempting to show the true impact of ‘free trade’..

He seems to look out for posts on ‘free trade’ then enters the thread and trashes any loyal American who supports constitutional tariffs and the elimination of income tax, the opposite of what the free traitors need and want to continue their economic destruction of America.

We have thirty years of evidence that ‘free trade’ is ruinous for freedom and a free economy. The best he can do is project his failed ideology on others.