[SeeSac]

I disagree - the “citizen’s” remark is not clear. The position of the Chief is that “citizens” should not own these weapons. Keep in mind who is writing the story, and what the intention of the writer is.

Please keep in mind who is writing the story and what the intention of the write is. The gunowner's statement is prefaced by another. You are JTS to make the link to the earlier statement when the gunowner says he should be allowed to own the guns.

[SoldierDad]

And, I’m certain that all anti-gun advocates won’t in any way attempt to spin the “citizen’s” comments to portray his words as evidence that “assault” rifles should be banned/sarc.