Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NC28203
Ethanol does not receive direct subsidies.

Paying companies to use ethanol in gasoline is certainly a direct subsidy. And mandating that use is another subsidy.

66 posted on 05/31/2011 11:51:36 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: thackney
>>>Paying companies to use ethanol in gasoline is certainly a direct subsidy.

Who gets paid to use ethanol?

>>>And mandating that use is another subsidy.

Mandated use is a benefit to ethanol producers but it is not a subsidy. There is no payment from the government to ethanol producers.

I do not support these policies. I'm just noting that the term subsidy is often misused and may provide an out for continuation of these programs. Look how people came to the defense of the oil "subsidies", noting that they are in fact tax credits and not subsidies.
68 posted on 05/31/2011 12:03:30 PM PDT by NC28203
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson