Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain
The Indiana court has no jurisdiction over the 4th amendment.

BTW, one more time, the Indiana case has been misrepreented.

Barnes was OUTTA THERE. Other USSC cases of recent vintage say that she could have barred the cops, as a resident of the apartment, but she not only didn't bar them, she called them to help her!

The case would have been easily decided against Barnes ~ the man ~ simply by noting he was NO LONGER A RESIDENT.

The major mistake the court in Indiana made was using Islamic exegesis to examine the facts ~ then writing the woman out of the case and ruling on the basis no longer recognized in English or American common law ~ to wit, that the man is the head of the household and even if he doesn't live there the womenfolk gots ta' do what he says!

I've noticed a decided disinterest on the part of the "home is a castle" people who've commented to deal with the woman's rights to be in command of her own castle.

In fact, a clear reading of Indiana's Castle Doctrine law makes it understood that SHE could have called in the cops, or just picked up a shotgun and turned Barnes into a spray of pink mist.

I suspect a number of them to be Moslems who've infiltrated FR in the last couple of years.

10 posted on 05/31/2011 7:17:23 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
I suspect a number of them to be Moslems who've infiltrated FR in the last couple of years.

The Moslems Are Due On Maple Street.

23 posted on 05/31/2011 7:40:38 AM PDT by 57 Red States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson