Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DH
Another scenario is that the prospective client comes into the attorney's office and the same routine is followed but the client is told “I feel confident that you have a case. I will represent you.”

Or, the attorney takes on the case with no hope of winning or even getting an out-of-court settlement, simply to get fees from the plaintiff - who may not even realize that he has a bad case. So my proposal is not for a 'loser pays' system, but for a 'loser's lawyer pays' system.

It's fun watching lawyers explain how this is a terrible, horrendous, impractical, unjust, unworkable, dead-brained really bad idea.

32 posted on 05/30/2011 6:12:48 PM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Grut

“Or, the attorney takes on the case with no hope of winning or even getting an out-of-court settlement, simply to get fees from the plaintiff - who may not even realize that he has a bad case. So my proposal is not for a ‘loser pays’ system, but for a ‘loser’s lawyer pays’ system.”

An important point is that we now graduate two or three law school graduates for every lawyer slot available. In other words, there really isn’t much to stop an otherwise non-working attorney from filing a lawsuit on the slightest chance of a settlement. Hopefully this law makes them think a bit harder.

(i.e., search Google on “Law School Scam”, to see just how bad it is now)


42 posted on 05/30/2011 7:22:14 PM PDT by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson