Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: truthguy

You sure are a moving target,,ill hand you that.
First, this thread exists because your boy said Sarah is obviously not trustworthy with the decision to use nuclear weapons.
But you have changed it into a discussion of her chances in a general election. Will didnt discuss that,,, he said she was clearly unqualified. He wasnt talking vote counts.

You also tried to back up Will by saying he backed Reagan. But when people point out that he was a VERY weak supporter of Reagan, you suddenly complain that supporting Reagan isn’t the litmus test of a conservative.

Face it,,, Will is out of touch, weak, and a beltway elitist that lives for big government. He may slightly prefer a repub to be in charge,, but i doubt he really cares. Your arguments perfect underscore how indefensible he is.


77 posted on 05/29/2011 6:11:27 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

“You also tried to back up Will by saying he backed Reagan. But when people point out that he was a VERY weak supporter of Reagan, you suddenly complain that supporting Reagan isn’t the litmus test of a conservative...”

Yes, and then there’s this- Why is George Will important anyway? Aren’t there better mouthpieces for conservatism? And another seldom-talked about feather in Palin’s cap is the fondness that Rush, Hannity, and Levin have for her. I don’t think you win the primary without them.


80 posted on 05/29/2011 6:16:47 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson