Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: meadsjn
There are still FReepers pushing candidates who are NOT natural born citizens (i.e. Rubio or Jindal).

We're in this current mess because of the Open Border Traitors of both parties, and voters who believe the Constitution and the Founders are a stale joke.

No, there are simply FReepers who disagree with your interpretation of what a natural born citizen is, which is only reasonable given that there's NEVER been a ruling declaring your definition, and there's a fair amount of judicial precedent to believe otherwise.

39 posted on 05/29/2011 9:08:13 AM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Winston; ASA Vet

There is no legitimate contention on what Natural Born means.

Four Supreme court opinions have stated that it means two parents must be citizens and zero opinions have disagreed.


50 posted on 05/29/2011 4:01:39 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson