Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The U.S. Postal Service Nears Collapse
Businessweek ^ | May 26, 2011 | Devin Leonard

Posted on 05/28/2011 6:47:53 PM PDT by 4buttons

He is struck by how many USPS executives started out as letter carriers or clerks. He finds them so consumed with delivering mail that they have been slow to grasp how swiftly the service's financial condition is deteriorating. "We said, 'What's your 10-year plan?' " Herr recalls. "They didn't have one."

(Excerpt) Read more at businessweek.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: biggov; freelazamataz; government; postal; postoffice; usps; veterans; waste
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-202 next last
To: driftdiver
Are they?

Sounds more like Congress has been ripping off the fee paid service money machine just because it can.

"They" are not losing the money ~ your Representatives are losing it; your President is losing it; your Senators are losing it.

It is remarkable that you find it at all useul to blame the agency for the misdeeds of the politicians.

Why are you covering for Obama and Congress?

161 posted on 05/30/2011 6:06:33 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Still refusing to take responsibility eh.


162 posted on 05/30/2011 6:13:24 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
We catch Boehner, Reid and Obama standing there stuffing cash in their pockets and that's somebody else's responsibility?

How bizarre. Mail users paid for it ~ it's hardly like tax money.

163 posted on 05/30/2011 6:18:44 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Yeah its a shame all those mail carriers didn’t get a chance to stuff that money in their pockets.


164 posted on 05/30/2011 6:25:40 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

It more properly belongs to the retirees. Darned shame Obama is holding onto my money. So typical of a thieving Democrat skunk isn’t it. Bet he’s buying fancy condoms for Michelle with my money.


165 posted on 05/30/2011 6:32:58 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Aside from the military I don’t think anyone deserves a taxpayer funded retirement after only 20 years of employment. Sure the govt should contribute just like the private sector. We cannot afford these massive pensions especially the double dip kinds.


166 posted on 05/30/2011 7:40:07 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Since nobody is getting a "double dip" pension, and 20 years only gives you a partial pension under any conditions (other than total disability incurred in the line of duty and you're a cop or fireman), what is your complaint really?

A 20 year retirement under the FERS system will give you about 20% of your high 3. Under CSRS that'd be about 30%, but you wouldn't get Social Security.

But the question was about what you think a FULL BLOWN PENSION might be. If you want to say 20% is FULL BLOWN, go ahead and say that.

167 posted on 05/31/2011 2:55:00 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I didn’t lose $8.5 billion dollars last year. Get back to me when you make a profit.


168 posted on 05/31/2011 5:39:23 AM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: SC_Pete
Seems to me your Department of Defense ran a $400,000,000,000 loss last year, and they plan on doing it this year as well.
169 posted on 05/31/2011 5:58:31 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

LOL


170 posted on 05/31/2011 6:06:55 AM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

The “bail out” they are referring to was not about the crashing market or economy a couple of years ago forcing ups or fedex to seek help from the government or go out of business. It was about what fedex called the brown bailout. The regime’s attempt to reclassify fedex’s employees under the NLRB rules instead of the Railway Labor Act. It would allow the Teamsters to organize fedex location by location, instead of the whole company in one bite.


171 posted on 05/31/2011 4:20:06 PM PDT by joelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: joelt

Using government’s powers to intervene in normal business decisions is a bailout when a company requests it.


172 posted on 05/31/2011 6:26:12 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

“Congress robs the employee retirement funds”

Correct. I’ve mentioned that on other threads where some have said the USPS retirees had better not receive govt funds / bailout and that they’ve already taken enough tax dollars. What these posters don’t realize is that USPS is not run by tax dollars.

They’re also unaware that employees pay into their retirement accounts just as anyone at any company with a benefits program - that this money was supposed to have been invested - and those accounts have been robbed, as you’ve mentioned. This makes jesse jackson extremely happy, yet it’s still not enough.


173 posted on 05/31/2011 7:43:59 PM PDT by Heart of Georgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“Aside from the military I don’t think anyone deserves a taxpayer funded retirement”

I agree. The thing is USPS employees do not receive taxpayer funded retirements - they are part employee funded and part of it is the benefits package they were offered when they hired on, which also is not taxpayer funded. There is no golden parachute type of retirement as many seem to believe.


174 posted on 05/31/2011 7:57:36 PM PDT by Heart of Georgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Heart of Georgia

When they keep getting bailed out its tax payer funded.


175 posted on 06/01/2011 3:25:16 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“When they keep getting bailed out its tax payer funded.”

Do you want to be informed and know the facts, or do you want to spread falsehoods?

The fact is the U.S.P.S. operates in the black MOST of the time and they do it through the sale of a product that no one is holding a gun to anyone’s head to purchase. Occasionally they are in the red, and they do go to Congress for funding in order to purchase multimillion-dollar equipment,etc. [BTW, this equipment processes your mail whether you use USPS, UPS, or FedEx]. However, the next year, when they are in the black once again, the money is paid back to Congress, so no loss to the taxpayer there.

Regarding the retirement accounts — if Congress takes money from private accounts that people have paid into without any taxpayer funding for 20 or 30 years — then that money has to be paid back. If you want to call it a taxpayer bailout, I can’t stop you, I just think you should know the facts as they are and not the facts that have been spun.


176 posted on 06/01/2011 7:06:47 AM PDT by Heart of Georgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Heart of Georgia

More falsehoods to spread

Post Office Loses $3.5 Billion as 2011 Cash Crunch Looms
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2010/08/05/post-office-loses-3-5-billion-as-2011-cash-crunch-looms/

80% of post offices losing money
http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20101010/DEPARTMENTS02/10100307/1029/FACILITIES02

Post Office reports loss, may cut Saturday service
http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/16/news/companies/US_postal_service/


177 posted on 06/01/2011 7:18:23 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Heart of Georgia

The first step to fixing a problem is to admit there is a problem. There is no reason it should be losing money, but it does. The Post Office loses money because it is poorly managed and is forced to deal with unionized labor.

Is there anything a union can’t kill?


178 posted on 06/01/2011 7:27:21 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

[Sorry this is so long, but I’m working and wanted to post my thoughts while taking a break.]

You may have some points there regarding other problems within the USPS. I apologize for not reading the articles you posted, but I don’t have a lot of time to read and comment on them right now as I’m self-employed and only get paid if I produce.

But I thought we were talking about whether or not tax payers were funding USPS retirements - which they are not. Now you want to talk about problems within the USPS and you appear to be diverting me to discuss another subject :).

That’s okay, but I don’t want to lose sight of the fact that if Congress has robbed the personal/private investments of USPS employees in order to dole that out, we should be suspicious.

It seems to me they’re putting forth a lot of energy and effort at getting folks angry at postal employees and not at the jerks who have robbed them. Does that sound like a familiar tactic to you?

We should not accept any propaganda they feed us about any govt entity, including all the news we hear about how broke the USPS is. Keep in mind we’ve been hearing that for decades, yet nothing changes. We should be looking at it as any other govt propaganda instead of repeating it until it becomes the truth to the masses - such as harping on taxpayer bailouts for USPS employees, etc.

As for the unions, they’re poison and I despise them. And they are another reason for the USPS reporting being “in the red.”

Whenever a contract comes up [such as this year] all of a sudden the USPS is operating in the red. But then the “negotiations” take place and smoke and mirrors are used with great skill by all parties involved. They scratch each others’ backs. In other words, it’s all propaganda and many fall for it - even on FR.

The unions operate to:
Legitimize thugs
Make millionaires of thugs
Provide funding for the election of thugs — who then prop up the thugs

- and around we go!

Good news is unions are losing membership by the droves and the USPS is losing skilled workers to private businesses and to retirement [I’m speaking of the workers who keep the multimillion-dollar computerized machinery running].

But the bad news is [my opinion] that eventually employees will have their checks garnished and given to the unions - and the skilled workers will have been run off so that all the jokes about nothing but idiots working there may finally be true - and they’ll be paid a “living wage” of course.

Also, for reasons of my own, I don’t believe Congress will allow their cash cow to privatize. I do believe they have something in mind to replace it with and this would be what the taxpayer would be forced to support - a mail tax if you will. I believe that may be where the propaganda is headed, and folks are asking for it because they’re falling for it. Again.


179 posted on 06/01/2011 9:08:52 AM PDT by Heart of Georgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

What was the starting point for that increase? 700% of 0 is 0.

If you’ve got a tax-free monopoly on a core infrastructure, an $8B loss is just incompetence.


180 posted on 06/01/2011 9:38:16 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson