“What a convoluted post, Paultard. Sorry, not playing your stupid game.”
It’s odd that every single post of yours starts with an ad hominem, no matter how many times it’s brought to your attention, and even that it includes false ones is not corrected. If it was too difficult for you to understand I could try and simplify it for you. Which part did you have trouble with?
“Its incumbent on you to post facts that dispute what I’ve posted.”
No, it’s not. I asked for links to your assertions. They don’t jibe with the experience of living through it. It’s a reasonable request.
“Btw, facts which I (and others) have posted many times before going back to 2006! Long before you ever joined FR. The truth will set you straight.”
More ad hominem. And, likewise - the truth sets everyone straight. Are you always this upset by people not agreeing with you when your downloaded assertions don’t fit with their own life experience? I see you didn’t take my advice about the water and the restful sit.
“No doubt about it. You NYC liberals and libertarians love Rudy. Lets see you defend Rudy the authoritarian, Rudy the abortionist, Rudy the big government liberal, Rudy the gun control fanatic with some facts. Lets see what you have.”
Who’s defending Giuliani? What he did in New York, is what he did. What you were saying about his mayoralty sounds false to New Yorkers. That’s just how it is.
As I posted, the Manhattan Institute is my main source for historic facts pertaining to Rudy Giuliani's record as Mayor of NYC. You know how to use Google? Look it up yourself. I won't do research for lazy libertarians. Period.
>>>>>What you were saying about his mayoralty sounds false to New Yorkers.
I said, crime began to drop under Dinkins. Crime continued to drop under Giulaini and Bloomberg. You took sides with someone who exception to those stated facts. If its so wrong, it should be easy to dispute. Otherwise, you're just pissing in the wind.