Posted on 05/28/2011 6:12:41 AM PDT by GonzoII
- The Foundry - http://blog.heritage.org -
Price of Unwed Births Far Greater than the Hospital Bills
Posted By Rachel Sheffield On May 25, 2011 @ 5:30 pm In Family and Religion | 3 Comments
A recent piece in The Wall Street Journal [2] noted that Unintended pregnancies likely cost the federal and state governments more than $11 billion a year, based on research published by the Brookings Institution.
A major reason for the cost to government, notes the author, is that women who unintentionally get pregnant are more likely to be low-income and thus are more likely to be eligible for government-financed medical care. The Brookings report [3] also notes that the majority (57 percent) of these births are to women who are unmarried: one of the greatest predictors of child poverty in the United States today [4]. The strong link between unwed childbearing and poverty creates little wonder that the majority of births to unmarried women are financed by Medicaid [5].
However, the costs dont stop at birth. In fact, its only the beginning. As Heritage Foundation analyst Robert Rector asserts [5], Once the taxpayer has paid for the childbirth, aid to the [low-income, single] mother and child will generally continue through a wide variety of programs for years to come.
In fact, roughly 75 percent of all families on welfare are single-parent families [4]. With the number of unwed births skyrocketing over the last five decades (more than 40 percent of births in the United States today are to single moms [6]), the cost of federal welfare has mushroomed. Currently, Washington operates more than 70 welfare programs at a cost edging toward $1 trillion annually [7].
Yet poverty and government dependence arent the only problems connected to single-parent families. Children raised without fathers are at greater risk for a host of negative outcomes [4], such as poorer social and emotional behavior, delinquency, and lower academic outcomes.
However, the answer to preventing unwed births for these low-income women is not more birth control, as Cecile Richards, the president of Planned Parenthood, proposes in The Wall Street Journal [2].
In fact, women from low-income neighborhoods report that a lack of access to birth control is not why they became pregnant. While some of these women say their pregnancies were indeed unintended, many report that they wanted to have a child or at least that their becoming pregnant was not completely unintentional [4].
However, while these women may be well versed in birth control, the message on the importance of marriage is often never heard. As Robert Rector [4] notes:
young people in low-income communities are never told that having a child outside of marriage will have negative consequences. They are never told that marriage has beneficial effects. The schools, the welfare system, the health care system, public authorities, and the media all remain scrupulously silent on the subject.
The growing rate of unwed childbearing is putting more families at risk for poverty, welfare dependence, and a host of other ill outcomes, leading to increased welfare spending and debt for the nation. Men and women in low-income communities must understand the critical importance of waiting to have children until marriage. Campaigns to promote marriage and warn of the risks associated with single parenting are an important step in strengthening marriages and communities. Furthermore, the United States must also take steps [4] to eliminate marriage penalties prevalent in many welfare programs.
Without the secure bonds that marriage provides, communities will continue to struggle, and the cost of government welfare will continue to rise.
Article printed from The Foundry: http://blog.heritage.org
URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2011/05/25/price-of-unwed-births-far-greater-than-the-hospital-bills/
URLs in this post:
[1] Image: http://thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/familyfacts/charts-web/325-FF-chart.jpg
[2] The Wall Street Journal: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704904604576333812220890544.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
[3] Brookings report: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/psrh/full/4308811.pdf
[4] one of the greatest predictors of child poverty in the United States today: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010/09/marriage-america-s-greatest-weapon-against-child-poverty
[5] the majority of births to unmarried women are financed by Medicaid: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/06/Confronting-the-Unsustainable-Growth-of-Welfare-Entitlements-Principles-of-Reform-and-the-Next-Steps
[6] more than 40 percent of births in the United States today are to single moms: http://www.familyfacts.org/charts/205/more-than-four-in-10-children-are-born-to-unwed-mothers
[7] 70 welfare programs at a cost edging toward $1 trillion annually: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2009/09/Obama-to-Spend-103-Trillion-on-Welfare-Uncovering-the-Full-Cost-of-Means-Tested-Welfare-or-Aid-to-the-Poor
Click here to print.
Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.
This is a cultural/moral problem - it’s not something the government can “fix” per se, other than to perhaps not have welfare policies that encourage it.
Many, or most of those unintended pregnancies were 100% intended. At least people should stop perpetuating that fiction. They know the government benefits given to women with children out-of-wedlock.
I believe tax policies should benefit families.
Of course that is just an incentive. Moral decisions in the end have to come from the heart.
But, but....I thought that financial issues and moral issues were two different things that nothing to do with each other......
You're onto something there.
The Gov. should begin to move this matter over to Christian charities. These folks will get the the MORAL guidance which the are in desperate need of, which one would hope would bring about a change in behavior, as well as financial assistance.
If we cut Medicare and Social Security we’ll have plenty of money to take care of these ‘unintended’ babies.
The false promise of consequence free sex, that birth control introduced, drove the prominence of abortion, to sustain that false promise.
Combined with the lie of “separation of Church and State”, we’ve been led to a Godless culture and an environment in which freedom can NOT survive.
Our founders noted well that our free republic can only endure among a God fearing people.
because ``gay marriage`` cannot produce the wed mother state, i.e., the married mother state nor reflect its opposite, the unwed mother state.
Ergo ``gay marriage`` is a contradiction in terms: a falsehood.
Ergo there is no such thing as an ``unwed gay`` because it cannot produce an unwed mother. It cannot fulfill the definition of `wed``; to wed in my 1887 Webster`s dictionary is union between husband and wife. A rose is a rose is a rose-
A rose by any other name would stink, and it does.
I believe there should be no such thing as tax policy.
Taxes ought to be for providing constitutionally authorized services, not social engineering of the serfs.
If someone wants children, then they should want them enough to pay for them.
By the way, why is it that only children of unwed mothers "cost" the government money?
Don't the children of the half of people who don't pay federal taxes "cost" the government whether married or not? If I remember correctly the child tax credit does not depend on the marriage status of the parents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.