Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: achilles2000

My referenced article said no rainy day fund money was used. Yours said it was. I don’t know which is correct. I’ll look it up.

But to be clear, I don’t deny that accounting tactics were used. Of course they’d have to be.

Either way, I thought it was significant that we cut spending for the first time in 50 years.

Agreed on Dewy.


127 posted on 05/28/2011 7:38:19 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. *4192*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: achilles2000

Your article is correct. They used $3.2b of the $9.7b rain day fund.


131 posted on 05/28/2011 7:51:21 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. *4192*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I don’t know how much Medicaid and school funding was gimmicked out. That should be offset against the alleged spending cut because it is really spending in the next biennium. If you find anything on that, I’d be interested.

The budget could have been worse, but I had expected something better with such large R majorities. Caving to the TSA and then the illegal lobby on sanctuary cities are additional sore points.


132 posted on 05/28/2011 7:59:04 AM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson