Which is interesting because it wasn’t an AK47 and it doesn’t make sense. She was hysterical. And I was like, and he was like, and he was this and that. She said he got an AK47 that he had and then he was throwing up. Huh?
At the moment, there's a lot of individuals throwing around a lot of scenarios that are mutually contradictory. If it was a drop gun, then extolling him for having the safety on makes no sense, etc. The key to understanding the event is to find a scenario that actually matches all the facts, then make conclusions from that. Many of these posts start with conclusions, then try to make selected portions of the facts match them. It's a great rhetorical exercise, but not much good in pursuing truth.
Q: Exactly
A: ... the one they had.
Q: Exactly
A: And I say why, why, where they kill him... and what? I don't know what to think. Why? Jose, Jose, Jose, he wouldn't answer me. He was just...
Q: Ok.
A: Like this. A little, a little...
Q: Because he had that, the weapon that was thrown right there, he had it,
A: Where did he take it out from, where did he take it out from, well, why?
Q: I don't know. Nobody...
A: Help me.
Q: Nobody planted a gun. Nobody planted...
A: I didn't see...
Q: a weapon.
A: I didn't see. I can't say. How? I saw him come out of the room, naked, wearing boxers... he was sleeping because he works at night and today he slept...
... Unbiased investigators, or cover-up?