Well, they have said over and over again that it was not a no knock warrant. I also read the transcripts of the wife and do not believe they ever served her with the search warrant. They did not read her her rights though they would not let her go. They interrogated her for a long time before they read her her rights and then they reinterrogated her. It is rather disturbing since she was hysterical and they transcribed both interrogations.
They were after the brother or brothers. They were proud of unloading their weapons and interested in “finishing what they started.” I should clarify that. I only read of one of the officers wanting to finish what they started. But I have not read the transcripts of the officers yet.
By AZ law they are only required to give a receipt. The warrant has to be signed and returned to the judge that issued it.
They did not read her her rights though they would not let her go. They interrogated her for a long time before they read her her rights and then they reinterrogated her.
That's only an issue if what she said is going to be used in a criminal proceeding against her. She could always have asked to be let go, or to not say anything.
They were proud of unloading their weapons and interested in “finishing what they started.”
That's your editorial opinion. Finishing what you started is a common thing to say.