It ain’t pro gay. It’s pro civil union. As I said, everyone ought to be eligible, like everyone’s eligible to form a corporation.
I’m not certain I even support it. But the idea doesn’t contradict conservative principles.
Oh, maybe in some weird bizarro world...
“It ain’t pro gay. It’s pro civil union.”
So.... being for homosexual civil unions is not being for homosexual civil unions?
A john Kerry “I was for it before I was against it” moment?
Right. It's pro-homosexual.
It’s pro civil union.
Two of a kind can't "mate". There is no union. There is only deviant sex. Civil unions are a step on the slippery slope to homosexual marriage which is an impossibility.
I’m not certain I even support it. But the idea doesn’t contradict conservative principles.
Yes. It does. We are talking about two people who have deviant sex pretending they are a "couple". They are not. They cannot "mate".
Hey troll, guess what. EVERY UNMARRIED ADULT IN AMERICA (who is not incarcerated or been barred by court order) is eligible to get married.
There is not a single law in any state that prohibits homosexuals from getting married and there never has been. Homosexuals have EXACTLY THE SAME RIGHTS when it comes to marriage that everyone else does.