To: metmom; GSWarrior
Supporting civil unions is not conservative. Two of a kind cannot mate in any way. It is not a “union”.
614 posted on
05/27/2011 9:56:04 AM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: DJ MacWoW
Exactly!
What is so hard for people to understand?
Conservatives support TRUE FAMILY VALUES.
Queer buggery advocates seek to destroy such values, to grind them into the dust, to brainwash children and set them against nature and nature's God.
Support of Queerness is not a conservative value.
616 posted on
05/27/2011 9:59:13 AM PDT by
Celtic Cross
(The brain is the weapon; everything else is just accessories. --FReeper Joe Brower)
To: DJ MacWoW
I think a conservative can reasonably support the idea of civil unions. Not much different from a “corporation,” really. Of course, they couldn’t just be for gays.
618 posted on
05/27/2011 10:00:35 AM PDT by
sand lake bar
(Adventure Time with Finn and Jake!)
To: DJ MacWoW
Supporting civil unions is not conservative. Two of a kind cannot mate in any way. It is not a “union”.*******************************
Agreed.
619 posted on
05/27/2011 10:00:42 AM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: DJ MacWoW
Supporting civil unions is not conservative.No disrespect intended, but I choose not to let you define my conservatism for me.
To: DJ MacWoW
Supporting civil unions is not conservative. Two of a kind cannot mate in any way. It is not a “union”.
____________________
Agree. They mate, at least the males do, but they are going in the wrong door and there will never be any offspring.
858 posted on
05/27/2011 2:55:47 PM PDT by
mojitojoe
( 1400 years of existence & Islam has 2 main accomplishments, psychotic violence and goat curry)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson