The study conducted and the article written are two different things. I have not seen the scientific report on the study so I can’t comment on the method and statistical model they used. The article itself was written exactly as a greenie or layman reporter would want you to believe.
And I am a molecular biologist.
The article title is the first sign of journalistic malfeasance. 93% of babies in the title but buried in the article it’s actually 93% of pregnant women blood samples and 80% of cord blood samples. Blood samples from actual babies are not mentioned.
And no mention that the Bt toxin has been in use as an organic pesticide for 50+ years.