Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Captain Kirk
Israel doesn’t mean the Likud, no more than the United States means the Democratic party. It is the Bibi worshipers who confuse the two, not me.
1. Defensible borders is the position of 90 of 120 members of the Knesset, not just the 28 members of Likud. (The rest are split between Arabs, communists, anti-Zionist Orthodox Jews). There is disagreement over what this entails, but not the principle. It was as true for Rabin as it is for Netanyahu

2. Comparing Likud to the Democrats? You mean a free market nationalist party, vs the Democrats. You really are desperate.

26 posted on 05/26/2011 11:07:32 AM PDT by rmlew (No Blood for Sarkozy's re-election and Union for the Mediterranean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: rmlew
The Likud's ultimate position is not "defensible borders" but annexation of all the occupied territories and either expulsion of the Arab majority and their marginalization via either disfranchisement and/or confinment to crowded isolated bantusans. If you don't see this as the ultimate agenda, you don't know much about Likud. Fortunately, their are some Likudites who honestly admit this, most recently Danny Danon, deputy speaker of the Knesset. See here
28 posted on 05/26/2011 12:52:05 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson