One way would be to compare the RGB color of the forged text and signatures against the average brightness of the paper. The paper brightness should vary since it’s not completely flat, and also because the scanning process always introduces noise into the measurements. I’ll bet the forger was SO amateurish that he used the same brush color everywhere. If so, do not pass go, go directly to jail, because they’re busted.
I contend that this is not only a case of forgery, but of identity theft. They clearly used portions of a real cert as a template.
I am trying to imagine how this will play out and I assume Obama will stonewall and say nothing but imply “birthers are nuts and are making preposterous charges”
Soooo it looks to me as if birthers have to prove a negative ( that its not real) the Dan Rather stuff comes to mind.....there it was evident to (almost) all that it was a forgery. How can that be repeated ?
Also it seems that you have to win in the court of public opinion as it will never show up in court.
The only way it can be a forgery is if the forger expended some effort:
The 'M' in "Male" was rotated by one pixel counterclockwise. It was placed one pixel lower than the 'e'. However the form line drops 3 pixels over the same distance. So this was not a bunch of slop as people seem to imply. Also it would have to originate in Hawaii. The slop came later with someone in the WH making layers and thresholding them for mostly obfuscation purposes.