[Steel Wolf]

Okay. It’s fraudulent. Now what?

You're kidding, right?

Nope, not kidding, just looking for the punchline. Information that has no use is useless information. It's trivia. Fun to know, but doesn't have any practical application.

So, humor me. Assuming the BC is fake, now what? Or is there a 'now what' at all?

[Hotlanta Mike]

Fake BC seems to fit in with a pattern of greater fraud...

“As noted by these documents there are 58 known addresses that have been connected to Barack Obama both prior to and after the 2008 Presidential
election. Furthermore, in some randomly pulled addresses I clearly showed abnormalities as it pertains to fictitious names also associated to the
addresses pulled for this report which are associated to Barack Obama showing possible evidence of Voter Fraud in the 2008 Presidential election.
This report also clearly shows that there are many new SSN associated to Barack Obama with no clear understanding as to why/how he has had access
to these numbers and why and for what purpose he was using these numbers.
A similar search will be conducted for Michelle Obama using the same technique as was used in gathering the information for this report for Barak
Obama.”

http://theobamahustle.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/addresses-for-barack-obama-in-a-50-state-search2.pdf

[SpaceBar]

Information that has no use is useless information.

That is circular reasoning. Often information that appears to have no immediate perceived use or practical value proves to be quite useful down the road as more pieces of the puzzle become visible or circumstances change.

[Cobra64]

So much for the Rule of Law and our Constitution.