Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinna
Apparently the victim had also been told by another employee the room was empty.

I've been finding some interesting ‘alleged’ facts about what happened...especially about the victim.

She had gone thru a secession of Hotel supervisors....her immediate supervisor, who found her scrunched down in the hallway, outside the suite in a utility maintenance closet she had hidden in... until Strauss had left and had heard the service elevator open where her supervisor was doing a standard floor check ......that supervisor contacted her immediate supervisor...who then called the hotel security. ..each determining there was enough said, and evidence, to call the police.

Throughout these the victim was nauseated and spitting frequently , hardly able to speak, and shaking as she attempted to explain what happened. A couple times trying to vomit....and when they went with her to the suite she was immediately distressed....( this behavior is typical, almost standard, to an individual who has been ‘forced’ to perform oral sex and that thru assault of some nature).

Furthermore...the time it took to calm her and follow the Hotels protocol was about an hour or so. This is about right as well.

So it appears some are reporting she heard Strauss leave the building while hiding in the hall utility closet and she came out of there when she heard the service elevator open...The supervisor explained they have standard floor checks which is why she was there at that time.

An interesting note is even when Strauss name was mentioned, the police had no clue who he was. Yet some are questioning why she wouldn't know.

The one thing very important is they do have plenty of evidence...from her spittle on the walls and floor...his DNA on her clothes...blood on the sheets...and most importantly a consistent explanation of what happened...her story was detailed and substantiated by the evidence...

And now we have Strauss whose attorney will claim it was consensual because they know the evidence witnesses etc. is compelling.

211 posted on 05/24/2011 2:41:56 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]


To: caww

Looks like someone is lying about the DNA

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.70d06a6c49b3b0a2f5170461c7277a26.341&show_article=1

Hmmm...I wonder why.


225 posted on 05/24/2011 6:54:35 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

To: caww

thanks for your excellent post.
IMO there are 2 possible options for the defense:
1. Consensual which will be very difficult to prove, as they were total strangers
2. Work out plea deal if the DA is willing.

Join the Ping List! I’ll be covering the case in detail as well as the cultural context and translated French sources.


232 posted on 05/24/2011 9:53:50 AM PDT by Cincinna ( *** NOBAMA 2012 ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson