I guess you backed the woman claiming rape in the Duke Lacrose team case too. At least at first report.
The Duke team had no such past of paying whores and had no recent whores stating just how bad of a client they were. It was all made up from the start and the team members stuck by their one story.
With the socialist IMF French whore buyer, we know he’s violent with the women he illegally hires and all the evidence of this lady’s accusations holds up while his story has changed just shy of a half dozen times.
There is a big difference in the veracity of these two cases. Strangely, you support the perv.
No, i didn’t,,, you see, she was hired as a stripper and paid to perform sex acts. It was different,,,
Case by case,,, Duke Lacross was a pretty obvious scam as the facts emerge. Just like this is pretty obviously a rape.