Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A link between climate change and Joplin tornadoes? Never!
The Washington Post ^ | Monday, May 23, 2011 | Bill McKibben

Posted on 05/23/2011 5:19:41 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

Caution: It is vitally important not to make connections. When you see pictures of rubble like this week’s shots from Joplin, Mo., you should not wonder: Is this somehow related to the tornado outbreak three weeks ago in Tuscaloosa, Ala., or the enormous outbreak a couple of weeks before that (which, together, comprised the most active April for tornadoes in U.S. history). No, that doesn’t mean a thing.

It is far better to think of these as isolated, unpredictable, discrete events. It is not advisable to try to connect them in your mind with, say, the fires burning across Texas — fires that have burned more of America at this point this year than any wildfires have in previous years. Texas, and adjoining parts of Oklahoma and New Mexico, are drier than they’ve ever been — the drought is worse than that of the Dust Bowl. But do not wonder if they’re somehow connected.

If you did wonder, you see, you would also have to wonder about whether this year’s record snowfalls and rainfalls across the Midwest — resulting in record flooding along the Mississippi — could somehow be related. And then you might find your thoughts wandering to, oh, global warming, and to the fact that climatologists have been predicting for years that as we flood the atmosphere with carbon we will also start both drying and flooding the planet, since warm air holds more water vapor than cold air.

It’s far smarter to repeat to yourself the comforting mantra that no single weather event can ever be directly tied to climate change.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Unclassified
KEYWORDS: agw; carboncult; globalhoaxing; globalwanking; greenreligion; joplin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 05/23/2011 5:19:43 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Childish prattle.


2 posted on 05/23/2011 5:22:05 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Public employee unions are the barbarian hordes of our time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Wrong link, Obama Turing his back on Israel
3 posted on 05/23/2011 5:22:48 PM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

what a dope


4 posted on 05/23/2011 5:24:08 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Poor Bill - still hanging on to the delusion...

5 posted on 05/23/2011 5:25:31 PM PDT by raybbr (People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Perhaps, now that we're not reflexively blaming everything on global warming (aka, “climate change”), we might discover actual causes.

For instance, consider these alternative hypothesis:

* overly ambitious fire suppression, combined with logging prohibitions leads to record forest fires;

* walling river channels in with dikes (levees) increases the likelihood of more damaging floods downriver;

* building in flood plains increases the likelihood of property damage;

* building major cities below sea level, increases the likelihood of flood damage;

* and so on.

6 posted on 05/23/2011 5:28:18 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The heartland has always been the focal point for tornadoes just like California endures its earthquakes and the Southeast their hurricane season.

Climate change and global warming have nothing to do with them.

These things are completely natural in and of themselves.

They are not man made.


7 posted on 05/23/2011 5:29:36 PM PDT by scorchedearther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I stand by the tested axiom, “Bush’s Fault”.


8 posted on 05/23/2011 5:30:09 PM PDT by camerongood210 ( Matthew 24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

More likely that God is not happy with our country and its leaders. I hesitate to say so, because one never knows. But a country can be punished for the sins of its leaders or its people, and history suggests that it’s not just the guilty who suffer.


9 posted on 05/23/2011 5:31:01 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The absolute garbage that passes for “journalism” these days.


10 posted on 05/23/2011 5:31:46 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (We live two lives, the life we learn and the life we live with after that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I remember 1974 being bad for tornadoes. I guess “climate change” was back then, too, huh? I mean, back then these Luddites were claiming we were in for an ice age.


11 posted on 05/23/2011 5:33:56 PM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Bill has his penis pump wrapped too tight around his neck.


12 posted on 05/23/2011 5:36:04 PM PDT by sergeantdave (The democrat party is a seditious organization that must be outlawed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Climate Change? Guess liberals got tired of all the jokes at their expense about 'global warming'. That said, at least global warming had some 'scientific basis' - a greenhouse effect. Like what happens when you close your car windows and let the car sit in the sun. But turns out liberals didn't have it right ( surprise surprise ) and real scientist are running from it.

Then liberals came up with 'climate change' - but there's no theory to go with it. Just 'give us grant money and power' if the weather's colder, hotter, more violent, less violent, wetter, dryer etc... They know their boys in the press would run with it - and that's the ONLY part they were right about...

13 posted on 05/23/2011 5:39:24 PM PDT by GOPJ (Osama bin SEALed - http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2009/05/terrifying-brilliance-of-islam.htmlI stan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

People see what they want to see. They (we) can see the exact same set of facts and come away with completely different conclusions. Global warming alarmists depend on this human characteristic to further their agenda.

Nothing more complicated than that.


14 posted on 05/23/2011 5:41:20 PM PDT by Let_It_Be_So
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
"1974"

Ditto. I remember the news reports in 1974 talking about the tornadoes like it was the end of the world. There are about 100 million more Americans than there were about forty years ago. That means any giant storm will cause more damage and fatalities just by the additional numbers of people living in areas that were formerly unpopulated or had smaller populations. The warmists never miss a chance to connect any weather event with agw.

15 posted on 05/23/2011 5:41:25 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Henry II was misquoted. What he really said was, “Will no one rid me of these meddlesome climate change fanatics?”


16 posted on 05/23/2011 5:51:16 PM PDT by JPG (Bibi 1, Zippy 0.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scorchedearther
I heard Joe Bastardi on the radio today talking about the global warming crazies.

He said the cause of the extreme weather is the fact that the temperatures in the 25,000 to 35,000 ft level are the coldest he has ever seen and that our weather is a result of the clash between the cold and the arm air.

Too bad the WPO can't be bothered to discuss the subject with someone who lives in the real world of weather.

It is only a few miles from DC to Bastardi’s office.

17 posted on 05/23/2011 6:06:52 PM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

We aren’t allowed to call record breaking cold weather and snow storms proof against globalist warming, so no fair calling tornadoes proof of global warming. We need an even playing field.


18 posted on 05/23/2011 6:17:04 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
"Caution: It is vitally important not to make connections."

"It is far better to think of these as isolated, unpredictable, discrete events."

Yeah, I get the sarcasm...except that I see this same behavior from you liberals every time there's a case of sudden jihad syndrome.

19 posted on 05/23/2011 6:17:31 PM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
It’s far smarter to repeat to yourself the comforting mantra that no single weather event can ever be directly tied to climate change.

Not as comforting as repeating to yourself that HAARP has nothing to do with weather control.

20 posted on 05/23/2011 6:41:10 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on its own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson