It seems he planned to rape the maid. What a creepy monster. I hate that he is defended here, even though I do understand that “theoretically” he is still “innocent.” But the circumstantial and other evidence points to a vicious, hateful beast.
I’m appalled at how many here want to convict someone of rape on just circumstancial evidence.
If this was you being arrested I bet you’d think otherwise.
In the US rape and child molestation all it takes in the allegation and the perp is guilty. We have swung the pendulum too far the other direction. Until you have been on the false side of an allegation you truly won’t understand how stacked the deck is against the accused.
The perp march you with handcuffs, the prosecutor has nearly unlimitted funds to go after you, and it’s 100% he-said/she-said. So it’s soooo easy for someone to claim rape and ruin another’s life. And they can do this without any real punishment.
My fix: Any false claims of rape means the liar gets double what the accused rapest would have received. It’s a lot harder to prove someone is lying so when they do they should have the book thrown at them. What ever happened to the liar in the duke case? Did she get jail time for what she did? She should be serving time for 6 cases of claiming false rape.