Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: saganite
The word "technical" was used to describe their fuel state. It's a fact that they flew into a large area of bad weather that other planes flew around. (The Der Spiegel article says the new data indicates that they did try to pick their way through).

The possibility that they would have to stop and refuel (something airline bosses don't like) gave them the motivation to do what they did.

40 posted on 05/23/2011 8:12:13 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62

“Technically”, meaning legally and factually, they had enough fuel to reach their destination with required reserves on their reclear flight plan. Deviations enroute for weather might put them below their reclear point fuel but in that instance they are required, by their FAA equivalent, to proceed to their reclear destination and refuel.

So, not only is your assumption that they flew into the area of bad weather because of an insufficient fuel state wrong but your assertion they did it because their “bosses” would be pissed at them flies in the face of regulatory requirements that they comply with the rules regarding reclear flight plans.


41 posted on 05/23/2011 8:20:36 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson