Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cynwoody
Why did Chester Arthur lie and hide the fact that his father was not a citizen until Chester was 14 years old? That is, why do this if such a reality was unimportant and not recognized as an issue for the position of V.P.?

Logical Answer: He recognized he was ineligible as people were taught the meaning of 'natural born citizen' in his era. Arthur covered up the circumstances of his birth (and even went to the extreme of burning all his personal papers before he died).

All the differences of opinion here about what the Founders intended are meaningless banter in light of the Arthur counter-example. These events took place when the original meaning of the phrase was still widely understood and not clouded by post-modern 'thought' and lawyer-ese.

A implies B

~A

Therefore, ~B.

P.S. I do not think ineligibility will bring down the travesty of Obama. But promoting the pretense that he is eligible is simply another Arthur-like lie.

168 posted on 05/23/2011 8:53:52 PM PDT by 22cal (Forgiven, not perfected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: 22cal
A implies B
~A
Therefore, ~B.

This is a logical fallacy, called denying the antecedent.
170 posted on 05/24/2011 1:04:55 PM PDT by 83Vet4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson