Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SkyPilot

You made a typo: “A prepubescent boy who is the subject of lust by a priest is a “condition” of “Ephebophilia”, right? Not Pedophilia?” It’s post-pubescent and then you’d be correct. My point wasn’t to excuse those who abuse children but to point out the media’s deception in the use of the term pedophile to hide the fact that most of these individuals are gay men praying on defenseless boys and in the case of a Priest are under their control due to the Priests position. It’s statutory or real rape under the color of authority in addition to being a sin. It’s also a violation of their orders.


44 posted on 05/22/2011 9:19:58 PM PDT by airedale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: airedale
I don't use this word very often, but I "hate" your comparison.

Raping a boy who is 13 is just as evil as raping a boy who is 11.

It is the homosexuals who have put up this "distinction" in ages. It is sick, evil, and twisted. Why you help perpetuate it is beyond me.

It is all child abuse. These are children. Children. Kids. Boys.

For crying out loud..........

46 posted on 05/23/2011 3:38:38 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson