Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX

OK, I understand now, there is no evidence just a suspicion ‘supported’ by the usual, special parsing of statements that contradict your theory. Thanks.


44 posted on 05/22/2011 12:18:08 PM PDT by Natufian (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Natufian
No, it is not just suspicion. Few people go so heavily into debt to gain a law degree and go to work for a law firm and then volunteer for inactive status after being ordered by a court to do so. The law firm she worked for has a reputation consistent with extreme political activism and the notorious corruption of Chicago government. For Michelle Obama to so quickly after only four years give up being a lawyer while they were so deep in debt and needing income is a fact that warrants further inquiry into the cause.

It is a fact that Barack Hussein Obama II did not disclose his aliases as mandated by Illinois law, as can be seen on the ARDC Website. It is a fact that he did not disclose his illegal substance abuse and possession with intent to distribute illegal narcotics. It is a fact that he did not disclose his multitude of illegal parking tickets, a misdemeanor or felony. In other words he committed perjury, which may have been a felony. The ARDC database records his voluntary entry into inactive status as due to retirement. How does an openly guilty perjurer get away with “retirement” rather than disbarment, unless something improper is in fact going on?

The situation is more analogous to a Democratic Congressman being videotaped as he attacks a Republican Congressman from behind and stabs the man to death, dances around the victim's body whooping it up, and then later on saying he wasn't there and you can't believe the faked videotape because his Democratic buddies in the prosecutor’s office and the district court refuse to arraign, indict, and prosecute the murder. Then the Congressman's supporters go onto a blog and say, you only suspect the crime happened, because no court has ever prosecuted much less convicted him for the alleged crime. Who are you going to believe, the nutcase conspiracy waving around all of that so-called evidence, or these fine and respected attorneys?

45 posted on 05/22/2011 1:00:27 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson