Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog
Not very economical in the USA, given the recent gigantic finds of shale gas.

I've read in various places that the economics of shale petroleum extraction are prohibitive. On the other hand, I've read that "fracking" is economically feasible, but that it leaves an unstable geology behind. Any thoughts on these issues?

7 posted on 05/20/2011 3:55:54 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on its own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Talisker
On the other hand, I've read that "fracking" is economically feasible, but that it leaves an unstable geology behind. Any thoughts on these issues?

Fracking has been a common practice in Texas for sixty years.

Whatever you're reading that mentions "unstable geology" is a piece of environmental propaganda BS.

Sorry, there's no other way to put it.

12 posted on 05/20/2011 4:28:50 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker
"I've read in various places that the economics of shale petroleum extraction are prohibitive.

I think you may be confusing oil sands (petroleum) with shale gas. This is the latter. No oil to be extracted.

"On the other hand, I've read that "fracking" is economically feasible, but that it leaves an unstable geology behind. Any thoughts on these issues?"

The amount of rock that is "fractured" is miniscule compared to the total shale mass. Probable effect = zero.

19 posted on 05/20/2011 5:10:11 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson