NOBODY has ever suggested that medical requirements to save a woman's life should be abolished (unless of course the requirement is a basic necessity like food and water, in which case the libertarians just want the woman murdered).
So, West believes that a child should be murdered because their father is a rapist or commits incest? For what other crimes does he believe the child should be executed for his or her father's deeds?
sounds like a rational stance on the issue.
Yep, abortionists are full of rationalizations.
its not pro-abortion and it leaves the choice with the mother.
So, he's "personally opposed" but thinks it should be the mother's "choice"?
so you believe the government should dictate the actions of the people?
absolutionists are always off the deep-end ... by definition
“NOBODY has ever suggested that medical requirements to save a woman’s life should be abolished (unless of course the requirement is a basic necessity like food and water, in which case the libertarians just want the woman murdered).”
Well said!