[muawiyah]

That 2003 statement by Daniels is in line with the then Bush Administration positions (internally or externally). The article is a paraphrase ~ you did read that, right?

The writer of the piece has no document detailing a Republican proposal for an individual mandate.

Why would the Republicans do that anyway? We are not Fascist Pigs like the anti-semitic Democrats who are preparing to kill the Jews.

I mean, your President today sold Israel down the river and somebody is worrying about who said what about individual mandate?

[Mariner]

"That 2003 statement by Daniels is in line with the then Bush Administration positions (internally or externally)."

That's a lie.

"Why would the Republicans do that anyway? We are not Fascist Pigs like the anti-semitic Democrats who are preparing to kill the Jews. I mean, your President today sold Israel down the river and somebody is worrying about who said what about individual mandate?"

And that's a non sequitor.

You can shill for Daniels if you want. It's only Jim that makes the rules.

But from my point of view you're attempt to associate me with the betrayal of Israel today is offensive, irrelevant to the discussion at hand and completely untrue.

However, it's apparent you're here to shill for your loser/commie/statist Daniels.

That shows you are neither a conservative nor a lover of liberty.