Skip to comments.
Circumcision Ban to Appear on San Francisco Ballot
http://online.wsj.com ^
| 05/18/2011
| AP
Posted on 05/18/2011 6:48:45 PM PDT by massmike
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
1
posted on
05/18/2011 6:48:47 PM PDT
by
massmike
To: massmike
The worlds on fire and this and gay marriage is important
To: massmike
Even by liberal standards, this is insane because it falls under the alleged “penumbra” of privacy that Roe v Wade is based on.
Or is that the purpose? They pass this and then it is fought on the grounds that it is unconstitutional for the same reason that makes abortion legal.
3
posted on
05/18/2011 6:57:43 PM PDT
by
Bryanw92
(We don't need to win elections. We need to win a revolution.)
To: massmike
Are you saying there are breeders in SaFo City? Who knew?
4
posted on
05/18/2011 7:06:05 PM PDT
by
februus
To: massmike
Anything involving the penis is the highest issue in San Francisco.
To: massmike
....so you can smoke pot, marry your boyfriend, walk down the street naked, ignore Obamacare, light “St Obama” candles -
But you can’t circumcise, smoke a cigarette, carry a “Palin for President” sign....
And they say America is in decline. I say they’re not paying their fair share. :)
/sarc(???)
6
posted on
05/18/2011 7:09:17 PM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
To: massmike
OK, pass a law the women under 18 with breast have to have mastectomies. Or, gay men over 18 have to have their lips sewn shut. There are lots of other laws that could be proposed in San Francisco
7
posted on
05/18/2011 7:09:45 PM PDT
by
JimmyMc
To: ronnie raygun
8
posted on
05/18/2011 7:13:22 PM PDT
by
Outlaw Woman
("...; because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee,... "Hosea 4:6)
To: massmike
I’m not sure why women should be allowed to determine this matter
9
posted on
05/18/2011 7:16:49 PM PDT
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: massmike
To: massmike
With no religious exemptions, this law would clearly be unconstitutional.
To: Nonstatist
I swear, the only people Libs hate worse than the white male are Jews.
12
posted on
05/18/2011 7:21:42 PM PDT
by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
Don't try to put your LEFTist hands on my penis !
13
posted on
05/18/2011 7:27:57 PM PDT
by
pyx
(Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
To: Lauren BaRecall
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”
I don’t think this is constitutional, but it will probably pass and have to be fought all the way to the Supreme Court.
14
posted on
05/18/2011 7:30:31 PM PDT
by
kalee
(The offences we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we engrave in marble. J Huett 1658)
To: King Moonracer
I don’t think any sane people live in SF. I think just a bunch of burned out dopers, 60s hippies that never grew up and all the misfits seeking queer heaven.
15
posted on
05/18/2011 7:31:12 PM PDT
by
RetiredTexasVet
(There's a pill for just about everything ... except stupid!)
To: RetiredTexasVet
SF looks like a zombie apocalypse too. Supposed great restaurants with hollow eyed skeletons delivering the food, Bleck!
16
posted on
05/18/2011 7:34:28 PM PDT
by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
To: pyx
17
posted on
05/18/2011 7:42:13 PM PDT
by
Misterioso
(A liberal is a communist, but too stupid to realize it.)
To: massmike
Hey, buddy. I got a tip for yah.
Have ‘m take a little off the top.
18
posted on
05/18/2011 7:49:13 PM PDT
by
seowulf
("If you write a whole line of zeroes, it's still---nothing"...Kira Alexandrovna Argounova)
To: Misterioso
What about us Rightists?
Sir, if you have a desire to touch my penis, please do not and get some therapy.
19
posted on
05/18/2011 7:49:53 PM PDT
by
pyx
(Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
To: Lauren BaRecall
With no religious exemptions, this law would clearly be unconstitutional Nope...there are many laws against things like peyote for example, used in "religious" exercises. Jewish people would be allowed their rituals once the child was of age. Just don't mutilate a child....male or female
20
posted on
05/18/2011 7:56:42 PM PDT
by
terycarl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson