Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather
Ok which is it....

“Airtight alibi”?

“Consensual”?

Or “Too ugly to rape”?

Considering that he has to know the DNA they pulled from her bloody rectum was HIS - the only defense that is going to stand up to that is answer #2.

31 posted on 05/18/2011 6:36:44 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

There are different schools of thought regarding inditification of rape accusers.

Here’s what Alan Dershowitz once said:

“People who have gone to the police and publicly invoked the criminal process and accused somebody of a serious crime such as rape must be identified. In this country there is no such thing and should not be such a thing as anonymous accusation. If your name is in court it is a logical extension that it should be printed in the media. How can you publish the name of the presumptively innocent accused but not the name of the accuser?”

http://www.nytimes.com/1991/04/21/weekinreview/nation-should-media-name-accuser-when-crime-being-charged-rape.html


45 posted on 05/18/2011 6:51:12 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson