“Airtight alibi”?
“Consensual”?
Or “Too ugly to rape”?
Considering that he has to know the DNA they pulled from her bloody rectum was HIS - the only defense that is going to stand up to that is answer #2.
There are different schools of thought regarding inditification of rape accusers.
Here’s what Alan Dershowitz once said:
People who have gone to the police and publicly invoked the criminal process and accused somebody of a serious crime such as rape must be identified. In this country there is no such thing and should not be such a thing as anonymous accusation. If your name is in court it is a logical extension that it should be printed in the media. How can you publish the name of the presumptively innocent accused but not the name of the accuser?