Exactly. Did the study look at how many of the offending priests classified themselves as homosexual? Doubt it. People get too hung up on the word "pedophile", which is prepubescent children (male or female) and for which the offenders can be gay or straight. But the victims here are older, and those offenders are referred to as "pederasts". The victims are almost exclusively boys, and the offenders are almost 100% homosexual. That's the dirty secret no one wants to talk about.
The article is covers this up by saying that homosexuality is not a cause. Homosexuality is different from pederasty, as pederasty is a sub-set of homosexual behavior. So, technically correct, but a damnable lie all the same.
I doubt it, too. Why ask the direct question when it's so much fun to avoid the issue?
Thank you very mch for your detailed explanation and your PREFECT© conclusion:
The victims are almost exclusively boys, and the offenders are almost 100% homosexual. That's the dirty secret no one wants to talk about.
The article is covers this up by saying that homosexuality is not a cause. Homosexuality is different from pederasty, as pederasty is a sub-set of homosexual behavior. So, technically correct, but a damnable lie all the same.