“”No, my problem with this is that there’s not one shred of evidence to support this latest conspiracy theory, just insane assumptions. Certainly not reason enough to bother a woman about her dead baby and ask for her birth certificate.”’
Well, where do you think the “shreds of evidence” come from? Spontaneous creation? She didn’t dream up the theory on her own or out of nowhere. Using birth info from deceased persons has been practiced forever.
She did tell the woman she was researching infant deaths from 1961. Guess what? That was the truth.
Unless there is factual info tying this childs BC# to obama, she is not investigating anything but the facts surrounding the death and burial. She did not pressure the mother at all, and only asked simple questions. No accusations or probing happened. Clara did not appear to mind answering the questions or to be upset by them.
I’m certain that if it turns out that obama has used a deceased child’s BC# you’ll be out in front bellowing, “so what-the kids dead and don’t need it anyway”.
Researching anything has to start somewhere. Some people are obnoxious when the question people, and don’t care about how they try to get info. Many aren’t bothered in putting out half-assed conclusions based on flawed or corrupted “material”. Like the liberals and the MSM.
This research is carefully done. And while no one has made an assumption, many recognize that IF the number on the obama COLB is not legit, it had to be “borrowed” from somewhere.
We can’t rule something out or include it even, without doing some research. Maybe YOU want to go through life believing every thing some politician hands you, but as for me, I believe skepticism is healthy.
To be honest, I don't think this is healthy. My position on the birthers has always been that they were looking for an emotional outlet to deal with Obama being President, but this is the first time I thought there might be something wrong with some of them. Like any conspiracy theory, this one is pushing further towards the lunatic fringe.