[norge]

“...a report by an unnamed researcher...”

OK

[doc1019]

Lends a lot to the credibility of the article. /s

[Cicero]

The report was posted here in FR earlier, and is linked in this article:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/13/research-summary-on-hawaii-birth-certificate-number-151-1961-010641/

I found the report extremely convincing and factual. And I can’t blame the researcher for wanting to keep her name out of it. Bad things can happen to people who do this sort of thing.

Why not read the reports—both of them—and judge them on their merits. The researcher in question is very careful not to make any claims she was unable to substantiate, I thought.

[OneWingedShark]

>>“...a report by an unnamed researcher...”
>
>OK

With Holder as the AG would *you* like to be named (especially if it has some truth to it)?

[Hotlanta Mike]

Research Summary on Hawaii Birth Certificate Number 151-1961-010641:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/13/research-summary-on-hawaii-birth-certificate-number-151-1961-010641/

Ladyforest is a FReeper...

http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2011/05/15/attention-whores-moles-and-morethe-thief/