Nonetheless, it gives lie to your thesis that Gaygory somehow 'confused and befuddled' Newt.
Olbermann killed his own career -- only on the surface was it about his comments. In reality, insiders tell me that it was because he was an insufferable prick in real life. Shultz nearly lost out for the same reason, but he barely hung on.
Gaygory should be removed, but it isn't up to us. I'd be willing to try, but I wouldn't hold your breath for results.
Of course oberdork was pretty obnoxious anyway, but there you have it. The method does work.
Again, Gregory's question was well thought out and it did befuddle Gingrich. It's not Gingrich's answer that's a problem ~ it's that he was easily befuddled. And, as usual, Gregory's question befuddled a number of people here.
I was not befuddled about Newt's problems. Been trying to figure out why he would even try to run for President. I hit that issue with him and "The Huck" over a year ago. Huck wasn't running ~ but there are people who want him to.
Hey, I want Ruthy and Sotomayor OFF THE COURT FOR HEALTH REASONS. Let 'em hang on until the next Republican takes office ~ but it's ridiculous to have a Supreme Court justice who can't walk across the marble floors without breaking her ankle ~ she has a brittle bone condition from 45+ years of insulin injection. Time for her to go. Same with Ruthy.
So, you have to ask yourself, is it better to try an impeachment to see if we can get a Democrat run Senate to convict Obama, and end up with Joe Biden as President, or should we simply hold out for wholesale removal of all the Democrats?