>There are numerous citizens who enjoy special privileges.
>Hate crime victims, Affirmative Action qualifiers, Food Stamp recipients, Veterans, the elderly, the underage, the poor, the infirm, in-state residents, etc.
>The list is endless.
Not all of them enjoy special LEGAL privileges; and none of them has immunity from being prosecuted for breaking the law.
So, by your own example, you show that this is *not* about the law being blind, but keeping eyes wide open for a shiny badge.
#1, each of the groups have special LEGAL privileges.
#2, This ruling does not give LEO’s one iota of immunity from prosecution. All it says is that you CAN sue if the raid is illegal, but you can't, because YOU think it's illegal, shoot them during the raid.
Read the decision, not what some stupid non-lawyer writer says it says.
#1, each of the groups have special LEGAL privileges.
#2, This ruling does not give LEO’s one iota of immunity from prosecution. All it says is that you CAN sue if the raid is illegal, but you can't, because YOU think it's illegal, shoot them during the raid.
Read the decision, not what some stupid non-lawyer writer says it says.