That is not what this case is all about.
The case, and this thread are about that the way to settle the issue of whether or not the cops had a right to enter is before a judge and jury, not with guns at 3:00 AM.
I have never, on this thread, mentioned 0300.
The case, and this thread are about that the way to settle the issue of whether or not the cops had a right to enter is before a judge and jury, not with guns at 3:00 AM.
Yes it is about warrants, at least tangentially, because it is about the lawful entry of police.
Any warrantless entry, even in exigent circumstances, is a violation of the 4TH Amendment. Any allowance of evidence found on such a warrantless entry is a violation of the 5TH Amendment's guarantee of due process (and the 14TH prohibition of the States's violation of due process if on a non-Federal level).
The police already have it easy, when it comes to getting a conviction: In their own words.