To: Second Amendment First
A business is not a social rehabilitation agency. They are in business to make a profit.
At the micro-economic level, true. At the macro-economic level, businesses make a profit by selling, and they need people with MONEY to sell to. Who are those people? People that work for businesses....
Maybe it isn't the role of business to be a social outfit, but would you rather have FedGov step in and handle it?
47 posted on
05/15/2011 9:31:08 AM PDT by
BikerJoe
To: BikerJoe
No I would not want the feds to step in. My point is that a business will hire an employee if they need one, not just to create a job. Those best qualified will get that job, and the money paid for it. I would think that the person who worked hard to position themselves for that job should earn the rewards that go with it. They would also probably be the ones most likely to spend that money on constructive things like their family, education and a stable home, rather than at a club with their banger buddies.
51 posted on
05/15/2011 9:49:51 AM PDT by
Second Amendment First
("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..." - Thomas Jefferson.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson