Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Newt would be an excellent candidate if he didn't have Newt's hideous character.
1 posted on 05/13/2011 5:36:26 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: libstripper

The age of Newt is over.


2 posted on 05/13/2011 5:39:00 AM PDT by bmwcyle (It is Satan's fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

“instant name recognition”

Which comes with way too much baggage.


3 posted on 05/13/2011 5:39:24 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

Tax-chick: No to Newt.


4 posted on 05/13/2011 5:44:05 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Obama's "Gutsy Decision": Who's gonna tell the fool that he ain't cool?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

Gingrich/Pelosi 2012.


5 posted on 05/13/2011 5:49:30 AM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

The question is how many people would vote for Newt in the general election to keep the zer0 from ruling over us for another term?


6 posted on 05/13/2011 6:04:04 AM PDT by panaxanax (0bama >>WORST PRESIDENT EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper
Newt Gingrich has thrown his hat into the ring.

And will be thrown out of the ring in due time.

9 posted on 05/13/2011 6:18:24 AM PDT by capydick (''Life's tough.......it's even tougher if you're stupid.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper
Newt would be an excellent candidate if he didn't have Newt's hideous character.

I'm not even sure that would be true. Gingrich seems to be an excellent person to go to for ideas and advice, but I don't really see him as having the qualities to make decisions -- he's an "idea guy" not an "decider".

10 posted on 05/13/2011 6:24:08 AM PDT by kevkrom ("Winning The Future" = WTF = What The F*** / "Kinetic Military Action" = KMA = Kiss My A**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

The GOP will probably trot out Jeb Bush and Daniels for VP. Bush/Daniels. That would provide continuity to the Ponzi scheme and Glabalization in the event Obama self destructs.


11 posted on 05/13/2011 6:29:27 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (Shut up and eat your Beans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

Your time is past, Newt. Heck, even my barber thinks that. A barber whose shop has been in your old GA 6th District for more than 30 years.


14 posted on 05/13/2011 6:37:40 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper
If he's the nominee I'll vote for him!!! But he is definitely not my first choice. I really don't see him getting the nod but I guess it's possible. As for his personal indiscretions.. after Bill Clinton how could any one be held to any sort of standard?
17 posted on 05/13/2011 6:43:12 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

It’s not surprising that Michael Savage’s butt boy has the same opinion as his master.


18 posted on 05/13/2011 6:49:10 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper
Congressional Republicans failed to persuade the public to remove Mr. Clinton from office; this is a damning indictment of Mr. Gingrich’s leadership.

Two articles were approved:
Article I charged that President Clinton "willfully provided perjurious, false and misleading testimony to the grand jury" on August 17, 1998 concerning his relationship with Monica Lewinsky and his attempts to cover it up.
The vote: 228-206 in favor (5 Democrats in favor, 5 Republicans against)

Article III charged that President Clinton "prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice" in order to "delay, impede, cover up, and conceal the existence of evidence and testimony" in the Paula Jones case by encouraging a witness to lie, by concealing evidence, and by trying to prevent truthful testimony by finding a job for Monica Lewinsky.
The vote: 221-212 in favor (5 Democrats in favor, 12 Republicans against)

'Twas the Senate that failed.
23 posted on 05/13/2011 6:55:54 AM PDT by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: libstripper

For the 10,000th time... I will not vote for anyone but a rock solid Conservative candidate... and I DECIDE what is and is not Conservative.

LLS


25 posted on 05/13/2011 8:58:26 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson