Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo

Quite honestly, even if Boeing came right out and said that they want to build in a Right-to-Work State to get away from the Unions, that should be the business of Boeing and the Union should have no legal fall-back. Legally, the Unions have the RIGHT to Strike but they do NOT have the right to not pay the price for being undependable, greedy and lazy. If this succeeds, then the implication is that the Boeing doesn’t own Boeing, the Union owns Boeing. That is a dangerous precedent. No one would choose to set up business in a nation that can step in and take over. If Obama gets his way, there is no difference between the USA and Russia.


46 posted on 05/11/2011 3:49:23 PM PDT by onevoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: onevoter

I couldn’t agree more. To me it doesn’t matter what the reason is for a company wanting to set up their company or parts of it in a right-to-work state. Whether they state it or not everyone knows it’s because of unions, screw the NLRB.


47 posted on 05/11/2011 3:57:37 PM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson