Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pan_Yan; DJ MacWoW; TheOldLady
Sorry to see you two go. I don't agree with you on everything, but it used to be we could agree on 80% and argue about the other 20%.

Let's see, the Paultards are typically pro-homosexual marriage, want homosexuals in the military, pro-abortion, pro-drug, pro-pornography, pro-prostitution, anti-military, anti-WOT, anti-Israel and happen to dislike taxes.

What's the 80% you agree with?

Not so anymore. The mob wants blood, the mob gets blood. I'm ashamed to say I've been caught up in it before.

This is a CONSERVATIVE forum, why should we accommodate leftists?

180 posted on 05/11/2011 1:29:33 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee
I may be wrong about this,but I had believed that Ron Paul advocated for the individual state's right to determine whether or not certain rights or behaviors should be enacted into laws. Those laws reflected the values espoused by the majority of citizens living in that state.

To me this was a correct Constitutional interpretation of the 10th amendment. Am I wrong?

Incidentally,I am unalterably opposed to gay/homosexual marriage.

192 posted on 05/11/2011 2:18:26 PM PDT by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson